| Title |
Multidimensional Assessment of COVID-19-Related Fears (MAC-RF): A Theory-Based Instrument for the Assessment of Clinically Relevant Fears During Pandemics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00748 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriano Schimmenti, Vladan Starcevic, Alessandro Giardina, Yasser Khazaal, Joël Billieux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 38% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,119,386
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,149
of 10,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,246
of 398,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#50
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.