↓ Skip to main content

No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina D. Kristensen, Bjørn H. Ebdrup, Carsten Hjorthøj, René C. W. Mandl, Jayachandra M. Raghava, Jens Richardt M. Jepsen, Birgitte Fagerlund, Louise B. Glenthøj, Christina Wenneberg, Kristine Krakauer, Christos Pantelis, Birte Y. Glenthøj, Merete Nordentoft

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 22 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,497,073
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,853
of 10,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,440
of 398,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#199
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.