↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing Behavioral Paradigms to Facilitate Development of New Treatments for Anhedonia and Reward Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing Behavioral Paradigms to Facilitate Development of New Treatments for Anhedonia and Reward Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.536112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy C. Bilderbeck, Andreea Raslescu, Dennis Hernaus, Anja Hayen, Daniel Umbricht, Darrel Pemberton, Jane Tiller, Birgitte Søgaard, Anke Sambeth, Therese van Amelsvoort, Andreas Reif, Georgios Papazisis, Victor Pérez, Matilde Elices, Damien Maurice, Valérie Bertaina-Anglade, Gerard R. Dawson, Stephane Pollentier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 21%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,577,721
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,367
of 10,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,720
of 420,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#189
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.