| Title |
Study Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic Adjustment Survey (CPAS): A Longitudinal Study of Australian Parents of a Child 0–18 Years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.555750 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth M. Westrupp, Gery Karantzas, Jacqui A. Macdonald, Lisa Olive, George Youssef, Christopher J. Greenwood, Emma Sciberras, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Subhadra Evans, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Mathew Ling, Robert Cummins, Delyse Hutchinson, Glenn Melvin, Julian W. Fernando, Samantha Teague, Amanda G. Wood, John W. Toumbourou, Tomer Berkowitz, Jake Linardon, Peter G. Enticott, Mark A. Stokes, Jane McGillivray, Craig A. Olsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 60% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 287 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 122 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 48 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 131 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,244,979
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#665
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,756
of 400,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#33
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.