| Title |
COVID Feel Good—An Easy Self-Help Virtual Reality Protocol to Overcome the Psychological Burden of Coronavirus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.563319 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Riva, Luca Bernardelli, Matthew H. E. M. Browning, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Silvia Cavedoni, Alice Chirico, Pietro Cipresso, Dirce Maria Bengel de Paula, Daniele Di Lernia, Javier Fernández-Álvarez, Natàlia Figueras-Puigderrajols, Kei Fuji, Andrea Gaggioli, Jose Gutiérrez-Maldonado, Upyong Hong, Valentina Mancuso, Milena Mazzeo, Enrico Molinari, Luciana F. Moretti, Angelica B. Ortiz de Gortari, Francesco Pagnini, Elisa Pedroli, Claudia Repetto, Francesca Sforza, Chiara Stramba-Badiale, Cosimo Tuena, Clelia Malighetti, Daniela Villani, Brenda K. Wiederhold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Iceland | 1 | 6% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 339 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 18% |
| Unknown | 127 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 31 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 6% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 140 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,030,641
of 25,204,906 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,738
of 12,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,240
of 416,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#78
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.