↓ Skip to main content

A Mixed-Methods Realist Evaluation of the Implementation and Impact of Community Forensic CAMHS to Manage Risk for Young People With Forensic and Mental Health Needs: Study Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Mixed-Methods Realist Evaluation of the Implementation and Impact of Community Forensic CAMHS to Manage Risk for Young People With Forensic and Mental Health Needs: Study Protocol
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.697041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Lane, Sophie D'Souza, Maria Livanou, Jenna Jacob, Wendy Riches, Roz Ullman, Anisatu Rashid, Rosie Singleton, James Wheeler, Peter Fuggle, Dickon Bevington, Jessica Deighton, Duncan Law, Peter Fonagy, Nick Hindley, Oliver White, Julian Edbrooke-Childs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 23%
Psychology 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,236,258
of 23,917,076 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,259
of 11,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,550
of 430,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#161
of 738 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 738 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.