↓ Skip to main content

Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) for Families of Young Children With Intellectual Disability: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) for Families of Young Children With Intellectual Disability: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.729129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elinor Coulman, Nick Gore, Gwenllian Moody, Melissa Wright, Jeremy Segrott, David Gillespie, Stavros Petrou, Fiona Lugg-Widger, Sungwook Kim, Jill Bradshaw, Rachel McNamara, Andrew Jahoda, Geoff Lindsay, Jacqui Shurlock, Vaso Totsika, Catherine Stanford, Samantha Flynn, Annabel Carter, Christian Barlow, Richard P. Hastings

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 16 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,220,110
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#645
of 10,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,470
of 511,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#30
of 717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.