You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Heterogeneity in ME/CFS. A Way to Understand Long-COVID19 Fatigue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.735784 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iñigo Murga, Larraitz Aranburu, Pascual A. Gargiulo, Juan Carlos Gómez Esteban, José-Vicente Lafuente |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Librarian | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,530,615
of 24,752,948 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,486
of 11,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,591
of 428,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#63
of 641 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,752,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 641 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.