You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Companions in the Abyss: A Feasibility and Acceptability Study of an Online Therapy Group for Healthcare Providers Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.801680 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorraine Smith-MacDonald, Jaimie Lusk, Dayna Lee-Baggley, Katherine Bright, Alexa Laidlaw, Melissa Voth, Shaylee Spencer, Emily Cruikshank, Ashley Pike, Chelsea Jones, Suzette Bremault-Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,838,583
of 24,132,754 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,625
of 11,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,954
of 509,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#315
of 709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,132,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.