You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of Integrated Social Cognitive Remediation vs. Neurocognitive Remediation in Improving Functional Outcome in Schizophrenia: Concept and Design of a Multicenter, Single-Blind RCT (The ISST Study)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.909370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang Wölwer, Nicole Frommann, Agnes Lowe, Daniel Kamp, Karolin Weide, Andreas Bechdolf, Anke Brockhaus-Dumke, Rene Hurlemann, Ana Muthesius, Stefan Klingberg, Martin Hellmich, Sabine Schmied, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, For the ISST study group, W. Wölwer, S. Abresch, N. Frommann, A. Lowe, D. Kamp, P. Ockenfelds, K. Weide, F. Pessanha, S. Dinse ;, A. Philipsen, R. Hurlemann, J. Schultz, N. Striepens, U. Darrelmann, C. Kloss, S. Wasserthal, H. Högenauer, N. Schumacher ;, F. Jessen, J. Kambeitz, C. Baldermann, A. Muthesius, C. Doll, H. Schneegans, A. Ferrari, G. Kolb, T. Haidl, D. Zeus, T. Pilgram, M. Rohde, P. Albert-Porcar, S. Hölzer, M. Hellmich, K. Kuhr, K. Rosenberger, D. Kraus, S. Schmied, U. Bergmann, F. Scheckenbach, A. Montada ;, S. Klingberg, D. Wildgruber, U. Hermanutz, J. Richter, J. Vonderschmitt, L. Hölz ;, A. Bechdolf, K. Leopold, S. Siebert, F. Seidel, E.S. Blanke, A. Brockhaus-Dumke, X. Solojenkina, B. Klos, E. Rosenbauer, S. Cinar, L. Herdt, F. Henrich, S. Neff, A. Meyer-Lindenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,274,524
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,717
of 9,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,566
of 439,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#366
of 858 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 858 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.