You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhancing neuroimaging genetics through meta-analysis for Tourette syndrome (ENIGMA-TS): A worldwide platform for collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.958688 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peristera Paschou, Yin Jin, Kirsten Müller-Vahl, Harald E. Möller, Renata Rizzo, Pieter J. Hoekstra, Veit Roessner, Nanette Mol Debes, Yulia Worbe, Andreas Hartmann, Pablo Mir, Danielle Cath, Irene Neuner, Heike Eichele, Chencheng Zhang, Katarzyna Lewandowska, Alexander Munchau, Julius Verrel, Richard Musil, Tim J. Silk, Colleen A. Hanlon, Emily D. Bihun, Valerie Brandt, Andrea Dietrich, Natalie Forde, Christos Ganos, Deanna J. Greene, Chunguang Chu, Michel J. Grothe, Tamara Hershey, Piotr Janik, Jonathan M. Koller, Juan Francisco Martin-Rodriguez, Karsten Müller, Stefano Palmucci, Adriana Prato, Shukti Ramkiran, Federica Saia, Natalia Szejko, Renzo Torrecuso, Zeynep Tumer, Anne Uhlmann, Tanja Veselinovic, Tomasz Wolańczyk, Jade-Jocelyne Zouki, Pritesh Jain, Apostolia Topaloudi, Mary Kaka, Zhiyu Yang, Petros Drineas, Sophia I. Thomopoulos, Tonya White, Dick J. Veltman, Lianne Schmaal, Dan J. Stein, Jan Buitelaar, Barbara Franke, Odile van den Heuvel, Neda Jahanshad, Paul M. Thompson, Kevin J. Black |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Psychology | 3 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,478,342
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,343
of 10,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,518
of 433,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#135
of 821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.