↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of a shared decision-making training program for clinicians based on the major depressive disorder guidelines in Japan: A multi-center cluster randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of a shared decision-making training program for clinicians based on the major depressive disorder guidelines in Japan: A multi-center cluster randomized trial
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.967750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshikazu Takaesu, Yumi Aoki, Yui Tomo, Takashi Tsuboi, Miho Ishii, Yayoi Imamura, Hisateru Tachimori, Koichiro Watanabe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#18,057,409
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,293
of 10,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,532
of 433,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#384
of 826 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 826 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.