You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cognitive behavioral therapy with adaptive virtual reality exposure vs. cognitive behavioral therapy with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.991755 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Trads Ørskov, Mia Beck Lichtenstein, Mathias Torp Ernst, Iben Fasterholdt, Asge Frederik Matthiesen, Marco Scirea, Stephane Bouchard, Tonny Elmose Andersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Researcher | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 72% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 74% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,072,172
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,346
of 10,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,435
of 438,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#188
of 743 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 743 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.