You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative efficacy of various art therapies for patients with dementia: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1072066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qian Liu, Fang Wang, Lixia Tan, Li Liu, Hong Cheng, Xiuying Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,289,791
of 25,247,084 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,492
of 12,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,746
of 470,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#116
of 640 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 640 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.