↓ Skip to main content

A systematic scoping review on the evidence behind debriefing practices for the wellbeing/emotional outcomes of healthcare workers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic scoping review on the evidence behind debriefing practices for the wellbeing/emotional outcomes of healthcare workers
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1078797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Rhys Evans, Calvin Burns, Ryan Essex, Gina Finnerty, Ella Hatton, Andrew James Clements, Genevieve Breau, Francis Quinn, Helen Elliott, Lorraine D. Smith, Barry Matthews, Kath Jennings, Jodie Crossman, Gareth Williams, Denise Miller, Benjamin Harold, Philip Gurnett, Lee Jagodzinski, Julie Smith, Wendy Milligan, Marianne Markowski, Peter Collins, Yuki Yoshimatsu, Jordi Margalef Turull, Mark Colpus, Mark L. Dayson, Sharon Weldon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Unspecified 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 18 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Unspecified 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,468,130
of 25,245,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,051
of 12,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,383
of 411,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#100
of 642 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,245,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 642 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.