You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation in the general public during the fifth wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1252600 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heidi Ka Ying Lo, Joe Kwun Nam Chan, Corine Sau Man Wong, Gabbie Hou Sem Wong, Janet Hiu Ching Lei, Yuen Kiu So, Vivian Shi Cheng Fung, Ryan Sai Ting Chu, Rachel Ling, Albert Kar Kin Chung, Krystal Chi Kei Lee, Calvin Pak Wing Cheng, Wai Chi Chan, Chung Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,888,129
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,759
of 12,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,625
of 252,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#52
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.