↓ Skip to main content

Design and methodology for a proof of mechanism study of individualized neuronavigated continuous Theta burst stimulation for auditory processing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and methodology for a proof of mechanism study of individualized neuronavigated continuous Theta burst stimulation for auditory processing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1304528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay M. Oberman, Sunday M. Francis, Lysianne Beynel, Megan Hynd, Miguel Jaime, Pei L. Robins, Zhi-De Deng, Jeff Stout, Jan Willem van der Veen, Sarah H. Lisanby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,526,101
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,398
of 12,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,102
of 216,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#55
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.