↓ Skip to main content

Risk and protection factors of mental stress among medical staff in the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk and protection factors of mental stress among medical staff in the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1334552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane Eichenberg, Raphaela Schneider, Phillip Auvera, Gabor Aranyi, Kurt Huber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,790,267
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#8,440
of 12,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,825
of 156,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#124
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.