↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and risk factors for depression in factitious disorder: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and risk factors for depression in factitious disorder: a systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1355243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla Comacchio, Delia Manuela Misca, Riccardo Bortoletto, Alvisa Palese, Matteo Balestrieri, Marco Colizzi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,799,253
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,331
of 12,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,086
of 150,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#42
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.