↓ Skip to main content

Markers of intestinal barrier damage in patients with chronic insomnia disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Markers of intestinal barrier damage in patients with chronic insomnia disorder
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1373462
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yixian Cai, Di Gong, Ting Xiang, Xiaotao Zhang, Jiyang Pan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,257,687
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7,628
of 12,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,471
of 243,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#155
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.