↓ Skip to main content

Recycling Metchnikoff: Probiotics, the Intestinal Microbiome and the Quest for Long Life

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recycling Metchnikoff: Probiotics, the Intestinal Microbiome and the Quest for Long Life
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip A. Mackowiak

Abstract

Over a century ago, Elie Metchnikoff theorized that health could be enhanced and senility delayed by manipulating the intestinal microbiome with host-friendly bacteria found in yogurt. His theory flourished for a time, then drifted to the fringe of medical practice before re-emerging in the mid-1990s as a concept worthy of mainstream medical attention. Metchnikoff also predicted the existence of bacterial translocation and anticipated theories linking chronic inflammation with the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and other disorders of the aged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 380 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 14%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 12%
Researcher 25 6%
Other 20 5%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 123 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 135 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#388,050
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#199
of 14,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,622
of 289,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#3
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.