↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping: A New Challenge in Clinical Medicine and Public Health. A Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
43 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping: A New Challenge in Clinical Medicine and Public Health. A Literature Review
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominic L. Palazzolo

Abstract

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, or vaping, in the United States and worldwide is increasing. Their use is highly controversial from scientific, political, financial, psychological, and sociological ideologies. Given the controversial nature of e-cigarettes and vaping, how should medical care providers advise their patients? To effectively face this new challenge, health care professionals need to become more familiar with the existing literature concerning e-cigarettes and vaping, especially the scientific literature. Thus, the aim of this article is to present a review of the scientific evidence-based primary literature concerning electronic cigarettes and vaping. A search of the most current literature using the pubmed database dating back to 2008, and using electronic cigarette(s) or e-cigarette(s) as key words, yielded a total of 66 highly relevant articles. These articles primarily deal with (1) consumer-based surveys regarding personal views on vaping, (2) chemical analysis of e-cigarette cartridges, solutions, and mist, (3) nicotine content, delivery, and pharmacokinetics, and (4) clinical and physiological studies investigating the effects of acute vaping. When compared to the effects of smoking, the scant available literature suggests that vaping could be a "harm reduction" alternative to smoking and a possible means for smoking cessation, at least to the same degree as other Food and Drug Administration-approved nicotine replacement therapies. However, it is unclear if vaping e-cigarettes will reduce or increase nicotine addiction. It is obvious that more rigorous investigations of the acute and long-term health effects of vaping are required to establish the safety and efficacy of these devices; especially parallel experiments comparing the cardiopulmonary effects of vaping to smoking. Only then will the medical community be able to adequately meet the new challenge e-cigarettes and vaping present to clinical medicine and public health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 479 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 107 22%
Student > Master 69 14%
Researcher 56 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 7%
Other 26 5%
Other 87 18%
Unknown 116 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 6%
Psychology 31 6%
Social Sciences 28 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 5%
Other 132 27%
Unknown 132 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#374,664
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#204
of 14,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,496
of 291,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.