↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic Accuracy of GPS Receivers for Use in Health Research: A Novel Method to Assess GPS Accuracy in Real-World Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic Accuracy of GPS Receivers for Use in Health Research: A Novel Method to Assess GPS Accuracy in Real-World Settings
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasper Schipperijn, Jacqueline Kerr, Scott Duncan, Thomas Madsen, Charlotte Demant Klinker, Jens Troelsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 39 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 12%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Sports and Recreations 12 9%
Computer Science 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 49 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,813
of 14,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,070
of 239,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.