You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
No Significant Difference in Depression Rate in Employed and Unemployed in a Pair-Matched Study Design
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00093 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adriana Mihai, Alina Ricean, Septimiu Voidazan |
Abstract |
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the differences of depression rate in employed and unemployed persons in the period of financial and economic crisis in Romania, in a pair-matched study design. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Egypt | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
Psychology | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,200,861
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,309
of 9,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,059
of 228,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#29
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.