↓ Skip to main content

Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) Pathogenic Bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
606 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) Pathogenic Bacteria
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thandavarayan Ramamurthy, Amit Ghosh, Gururaja P. Pazhani, Sumio Shinoda

Abstract

Under stress conditions, many species of bacteria enter into starvation mode of metabolism or a physiologically viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state. Several human pathogenic bacteria have been reported to enter into the VBNC state under these conditions. The pathogenic VBNC bacteria cannot be grown using conventional culture media, although they continue to retain their viability and express their virulence. Though there have been debates on the VBNC concept in the past, several molecular studies have shown that not only can the VBNC state be induced under in vitro conditions but also that resuscitation from this state is possible under appropriate conditions. The most notable advance in resuscitating VBNC bacteria is the discovery of resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf), which is a bacterial cytokines found in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. VBNC state is a survival strategy adopted by the bacteria, which has important implication in several fields, including environmental monitoring, food technology, and infectious disease management; and hence it is important to investigate the association of bacterial pathogens under VBNC state and the water/foodborne outbreaks. In this review, we describe various aspects of VBNC bacteria, which include their proteomic and genetic profiles under the VBNC state, conditions of resuscitation, methods of detection, antibiotic resistance, and observations on Rpf.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 606 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 599 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 20%
Student > Master 93 15%
Researcher 88 15%
Student > Bachelor 51 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Other 62 10%
Unknown 147 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 49 8%
Environmental Science 38 6%
Engineering 29 5%
Other 77 13%
Unknown 172 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,097,254
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,435
of 9,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,494
of 228,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#16
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.