You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual-Use Research Debates and Public Health: Better Integration Would Do No Harm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan E. Suk, Cornelius Bartels, Eeva Broberg, Marc J. Struelens, Amanda J. Ozin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 75% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,941,088
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,219
of 9,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,180
of 243,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#28
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.