You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perceived Utility of the RE-AIM Framework for Health Promotion/Disease Prevention Initiatives for Older Adults: A Case Study from the U.S. Evidence-Based Disease Prevention Initiative
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00143 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcia G. Ory, Mary Altpeter, Basia Belza, Janet Helduser, Chen Zhang, Matthew Lee Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Psychology | 6 | 7% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 26 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,689,844
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,817
of 10,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,600
of 265,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#14
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.