You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Link between Health Complaints and Wind Turbines: Support for the Nocebo Expectations Hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00220 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Crichton, Simon Chapman, Tim Cundy, Keith J. Petrie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 26% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 80% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Psychology | 11 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#360,135
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#199
of 14,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,591
of 272,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.