You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Job Maintenance by Supported Employment: An Overview of the “Supported Employment Plus” Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfram Kawohl, Jörn Moock, Sandra Heuchert, Wulf Rössler |
| Abstract |
The number of days of absence from work associated with mental illness has risen dramatically in the past 10 years in Germany. Companies are challenged by this issue and seek help for the physical and mental health of their employees. Supported Employment concepts such as the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model have been designed to bring jobless persons with mental disorders back to work. In the randomized, controlled SEplus trial, a modified IPS-approach is tested concerning its ability to shorten times of sick leave of persons with mental distress or a mental disorder and to prevent them from losing their job. The trial is outlined in this study protocol. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 47 | 67% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Librarian | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 48 | 69% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,409,030
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,662
of 9,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,633
of 266,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#56
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.