↓ Skip to main content

Mobile Network Data for Public Health: Opportunities and Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
63 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobile Network Data for Public Health: Opportunities and Challenges
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuria Oliver, Aleksandar Matic, Enrique Frias-Martinez

Abstract

The ubiquity of mobile phones worldwide is generating an unprecedented amount of human behavioral data both at an individual and aggregated levels. The study of this data as a rich source of information about human behavior emerged almost a decade ago. Since then, it has grown into a fertile area of research named computational social sciences with a wide variety of applications in different fields such as social networks, urban and transport planning, economic development, emergency relief, and, recently, public health. In this paper, we briefly describe the state of the art on using mobile phone data for public health, and present the opportunities and challenges that this kind of data presents for public health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 15%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Engineering 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#696,553
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#369
of 14,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,242
of 276,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.