↓ Skip to main content

Occurrence and Diversity of Clinically Important Vibrio Species in the Aquatic Environment of Georgia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occurrence and Diversity of Clinically Important Vibrio Species in the Aquatic Environment of Georgia
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamar Kokashvili, Chris A. Whitehouse, Ana Tskhvediani, Christopher J. Grim, Tinatin Elbakidze, Nino Mitaishvili, Nino Janelidze, Ekaterine Jaiani, Bradd J. Haley, Nino Lashkhi, Anwar Huq, Rita R. Colwell, Marina Tediashvili

Abstract

Among the more than 70 different Vibrio species inhabiting marine, estuarine, and freshwater ecosystems, 12 are recognized as human pathogens. The warm subtropical climate of the Black Sea coastal area and inland regions of Georgia likely provides a favorable environment for various Vibrio species. From 2006 to 2009, the abundance, ecology, and diversity of clinically important Vibrio species were studied in different locations in Georgia and across seasons. Over a 33-month period, 1,595 presumptive Vibrio isolates were collected from the Black Sea (n = 657) and freshwater lakes around Tbilisi (n = 938). Screening of a subset of 440 concentrated and enriched water samples by PCR-electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry (PCR-ESI/MS) detected the presence of DNA from eight clinically important Vibrio species: V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. mimicus, V. alginolyticus, V. harveyi, V. metschnikovii, and V. cincinnatiensis. Almost 90% of PCR/ESI-MS samples positive for Vibrio species were collected from June through November. Three important human-pathogenic Vibrio species (V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus) were detected in 62.8, 37.8, and 21.4% of samples testing positive for Vibrios, respectively. The results of these activities suggest that natural reservoirs for human-pathogenic Vibrios exist in Georgian aquatic environments. Water temperature at all sampling sites was positively correlated with the abundance of clinically important Vibrio spp. (except V. metschnikovii), and salinity was correlated with species composition at particular Black Sea sites as well as inland reservoirs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#392,967
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#158
of 9,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,219
of 279,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#3
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.