↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Potential and Limitations of Leveraging Food Sovereignty to Improve Human Health

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the Potential and Limitations of Leveraging Food Sovereignty to Improve Human Health
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D. Jones, Lilly Fink Shapiro, Mark L. Wilson

Abstract

Food sovereignty has been defined as "the right of peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems." Human health is an implied component of this definition through the principle of healthy food. In fact, improved human health is commonly cited as a benefit of transforming food production away from the dominant practices of industrial agriculture. Yet, does the use of "ecologically sound and sustainable methods" of food production necessarily translate into better human health outcomes? Does greater choice in defining an agricultural or food system create gains in health and well-being? We elucidate the conceptual linkages between food sovereignty and human health, critically examine the empirical evidence supporting or refuting these linkages, and identify research gaps and key priorities for the food sovereignty-human health research agenda. Five domains of food sovereignty are discussed including: (1) use of agroecological management practices for food production, (2) the localization of food production and consumption, (3) promotion of social justice and equity, (4) valuation of traditional knowledge, and (5) the transformation of economic and political institutions and structures to support self-determination. We find that although there are many plausible linkages between food sovereignty and human health, the empirical evidence in support of the hypothesis that increasing food sovereignty yields improvements to human health is weak. We propose that a concerted effort to generate new empirical evidence on the health implications of these domains of food sovereignty is urgently needed, and suggest areas of research that may be crucial for addressing the gaps in the evidence base.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,829,320
of 23,335,153 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#6,154
of 10,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,529
of 388,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#40
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,335,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.