↓ Skip to main content

Newborn Health Interventions and Challenges for Implementation in Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Newborn Health Interventions and Challenges for Implementation in Nepal
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Resham Bahadur Khatri, Shiva Raj Mishra, Vishnu Khanal, Khageshwor Gelal, Subas Neupane

Abstract

Neonatal mortality is a major challenge in reducing child mortality rates in Nepal. Despite efforts by the Government of Nepal, data from the last three demographic and health surveys show a rise in the contribution of neonatal deaths to infant and child mortality. The Government of Nepal has implemented community-based programs that were piloted and then scaled up based on lessons learned. These programs include, but are not limited to ensuring safe motherhood, birth preparedness package, community-based newborn care package, and integrated management of childhood illnesses. Despite the implementation of such programs on a larger scale, their effective coverage is yet to be achieved. Health system challenges included an inadequate policy environment, funding gaps, inadequate procurement, and insufficient supplies of commodities, while human resource management has been found to be impeding service delivery. Such bottlenecks at policy, institutional and service delivery level need to be addressed incorporating health information in decision-making as well as working in partnership with communities to facilitate the utilization of available services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 24%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,713,549
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#8,020
of 10,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,618
of 402,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#58
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.