↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Pesticides and Human Health: The Urgent Need for a New Concept in Agriculture

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
2488 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemical Pesticides and Human Health: The Urgent Need for a New Concept in Agriculture
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Polyxeni Nicolopoulou-Stamati, Sotirios Maipas, Chrysanthi Kotampasi, Panagiotis Stamatis, Luc Hens

Abstract

The industrialization of the agricultural sector has increased the chemical burden on natural ecosystems. Pesticides are agrochemicals used in agricultural lands, public health programs, and urban green areas in order to protect plants and humans from various diseases. However, due to their known ability to cause a large number of negative health and environmental effects, their side effects can be an important environmental health risk factor. The urgent need for a more sustainable and ecological approach has produced many innovative ideas, among them agriculture reforms and food production implementing sustainable practice evolving to food sovereignty. It is more obvious than ever that the society needs the implementation of a new agricultural concept regarding food production, which is safer for man and the environment, and to this end, steps such as the declaration of Nyéléni have been taken.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2488 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 335 13%
Student > Master 329 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 273 11%
Researcher 187 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 102 4%
Other 328 13%
Unknown 934 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 439 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 201 8%
Chemistry 161 6%
Environmental Science 144 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 83 3%
Other 430 17%
Unknown 1030 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 458. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#61,128
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#53
of 14,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,295
of 379,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.