You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Human–Nature Relationship and Its Impact on Health: A Critical Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00260 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentine Seymour |
| Abstract |
Within the past four decades, research has been increasingly drawn toward understanding whether there is a link between the changing human-nature relationship and its impact on people's health. However, to examine whether there is a link requires research of its breadth and underlying mechanisms from an interdisciplinary approach. This article begins by reviewing the debates concerning the human-nature relationship, which are then critiqued and redefined from an interdisciplinary perspective. The concept and chronological history of "health" is then explored, based on the World Health Organization's definition. Combining these concepts, the human-nature relationship and its impact on human's health are then explored through a developing conceptual model. It is argued that using an interdisciplinary perspective can facilitate a deeper understanding of the complexities involved for attaining optimal health at the human-environmental interface. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Seychelles | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 556 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 92 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 12% |
| Researcher | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 89 | 16% |
| Unknown | 197 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 65 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 7% |
| Psychology | 33 | 6% |
| Design | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 121 | 22% |
| Unknown | 224 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,411,551
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#717
of 14,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,505
of 418,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#6
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.