Title |
Physical Activity and Survival among Long-term Cancer Survivor and Non-Cancer Cohorts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00019 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony S. Gunnell, Sarah Joyce, Stephania Tomlin, Dennis R. Taaffe, Prue Cormie, Robert U. Newton, David Joseph, Nigel Spry, Kristjana Einarsdóttir, Daniel A. Galvão |
Abstract |
Evidence suggests physical activity improves prognosis following cancer diagnosis; however, evidence regarding prognosis in long-term survivors of cancer is scarce. We assessed physical activity in 1,589 cancer survivors at an average 8.8 years following their initial diagnosis and calculated their future mortality risk following physical activity assessment. We also selected a cancer-free cohort of 3,145 age, sex, and survey year group-matched cancer-free individuals from the same source population for comparison purposes. Risks for cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality in relation to physical activity levels were estimated using Cox regression proportional hazard regression analyses within the cancer and non-cancer cohorts. Physical activity levels of 360+ min per week were inversely associated with cancer-specific mortality in long-term cancer survivors [hazard ratios (HR) = 0.30 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.13-0.70)] and participants without prior cancer [HR = 0.16 (95% CI 0.05-0.56)] compared with no reported physical activity. Physical activity levels of 150-359 and 360+ min were inversely associated with all-cause mortality in long-term cancer survivors [150-359 min; HR = 0.55 (95% CI 0.31-0.97), 360+ min; HR = 0.41 (95% CI 0.21-0.79)] and those without prior cancer [150-359 min; HR = 0.52 (95% CI 0.32-0.86), 360+ min; HR = 0.50 (95% CI 0.29-0.88)]. These results suggest that meeting exercise guidelines of 150 min of physical activity per week were associated with reduced all-cause mortality in both long-term cancer surviving and cancer-free cohorts. Exceeding exercise oncology guidelines (360+ min per week) may provide additional protection in terms of cancer-specific death. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 13 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 12% |
United States | 6 | 9% |
Spain | 6 | 9% |
Australia | 5 | 7% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 40 | 59% |
Scientists | 14 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 23% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 31% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |