↓ Skip to main content

The Road to Dog Rabies Control and Elimination—What Keeps Us from Moving Faster?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Road to Dog Rabies Control and Elimination—What Keeps Us from Moving Faster?
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna S. Fahrion, Louise H. Taylor, Gregorio Torres, Thomas Müller, Salome Dürr, Lea Knopf, Katinka de Balogh, Louis H. Nel, Mary Joy Gordoncillo, Bernadette Abela-Ridder

Abstract

Rabies, a vaccine preventable neglected tropical disease, still claims an estimated 35,000-60,000 human lives annually. The international community, with more than 100 endemic countries, has set a global target of 0 human deaths from dog-transmitted rabies by 2030. While it has been proven in several countries and regions that elimination of rabies as a public health problem is feasible and tools are available, rabies deaths globally have not yet been prevented effectively. While there has been extensive rabies research, specific areas of implementation for control and elimination have not been sufficiently addressed. This article highlights some of the commonest perceived barriers for countries to implementing rabies control and elimination programs and discusses possible solutions for sociopolitical, organizational, technical, and resource-linked requirements, following the pillars of the global framework for the elimination of dog-mediated human rabies adopted at the global rabies meeting in December 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 23%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 52 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 65 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,780,100
of 25,027,753 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,256
of 13,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,561
of 315,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#10
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,027,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.