You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: A CRISPR New World: Attitudes in the Public toward Innovations in Human Genetic Modification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00161 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven M. Weisberg, Daniel Badgio, Anjan Chatterjee |
Abstract |
[This corrects the article on p. 117 in vol. 5, PMID: 28589120.]. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,576,984
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,773
of 10,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,501
of 313,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#30
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.