↓ Skip to main content

Are Exposures to Multiple Frequencies the Key to Future Radiofrequency Research?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are Exposures to Multiple Frequencies the Key to Future Radiofrequency Research?
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zenon Sienkiewicz, Carolina Calderón, Kerry A. Broom, Darren Addison, Amélie Gavard, Louise Lundberg, Myron Maslanyj

Abstract

There is an extensive literature investigating possible effects of exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields associated with mobile phone technologies. This has not identified any public health risks with any degree of certainty. Some epidemiological studies have observed associations between heavy users of mobile phones and some types of cancer, but animal studies do not support this association, although a few studies have reported increased tumor yields. However, there is a crucial difference between epidemiology studies and laboratory work in terms of signals investigated: most people are exposed to a complex mixture of frequencies and signals at varying intensities, whereas the majority of animal studies have been performed using a single frequency or intensity. Whether this might explain the differences in outcome will be discussed, and whether there is a need for additional laboratory investigations that reproduce more accurately realistic exposure conditions will be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Engineering 2 14%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,578,649
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,875
of 10,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,466
of 439,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#67
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.