↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Adolescent Self-Awareness and Accuracy Using a Performance-Based Assessment and Parental Report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring Adolescent Self-Awareness and Accuracy Using a Performance-Based Assessment and Parental Report
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Zlotnik, Joan Toglia

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess awareness of performance and performance accuracy for a task that requires executive functions (EF), among healthy adolescents and to compare their performance to their parent's ratings. Participants: 109 healthy adolescents (mean age 15.2 ± 1.86 years) completed the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA). The discrepancy between self-estimated and actual performance was used to measure the level of awareness. The participants were divided into high and low accuracy groups according to the WCPA accuracy median score. The participants were also divided into high and low awareness groups. A comparison was conducted between groups using WCPA performance and parent ratings on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Higher awareness was associated with better EF performance. Participants with high accuracy scores were more likely to show high awareness of performance as compared to participants with low accuracy scores. The high accuracy group had better parental ratings of EF, higher efficiency, followed more rules, and were more aware of their WCPA performance. Our results highlight the important contribution that self-awareness of performance may have on the individual's function. Assessing the level of awareness and providing metacognitive training techniques for those adolescents who are less aware, could support their performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Lecturer 6 12%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#23,117,788
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#10,042
of 14,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#391,703
of 450,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#93
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.