↓ Skip to main content

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: The Delivery Challenge

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: The Delivery Challenge
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem D. F. Venter

Abstract

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), despite its efficacy, has been slow in uptake throughout the world. This article discusses the operational and service delivery complexity, based on early real-world experience, with some recommendations on how this promising intervention could be made more available. Currently, access to PrEP is made complex by restricting delivery to dedicated health facilities, as well as requirements around HIV testing and toxicity monitoring. Expanding to verticalized services that focus on well-defined populations where HIV testing and treatment programmes already exist, has proven relatively simple. Providing PrEP outside of this environment has yet to be demonstrated at any scale, and will likely require innovative thinking addressing the regulatory and clinical environment, so as to ensure easier access to this promising HIV prevention tool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,924,081
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,103
of 10,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,046
of 327,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#22
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.