You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00261 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiang Zhang, Jin Li, Alistair Middleton, Sudin Bhattacharya, Rory B. Conolly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,139
of 14,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,533
of 351,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#72
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.