You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Retrospective Cross Sectional Study of the Effectiveness of a Project in Improving Infant Health in Bwindi, South Western Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00290 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Robert Kamugisha, Andrew E. Dobson, Alex G. Stewart, Nahabwe Haven, Birungi Mutahunga, Ewan Wilkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,426,850
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,690
of 10,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,806
of 346,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#75
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.