You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Implementation of a Multisector Population Health Collaborative That Uses a Bridging Hub Organization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00315 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron L. Leppin, Janet M. Okamoto, Paige W. Organick, Anjali D. Thota, Francisco J. Barrera-Flores, Mark L. Wieland, Rozalina G. McCoy, Robert P. Bonacci, Victor M. Montori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,161,995
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,409
of 13,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,305
of 358,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#17
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.