You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Russell E. Glasgow, Samantha M. Harden, Bridget Gaglio, Borsika Rabin, Matthew Lee Smith, Gwenndolyn C. Porter, Marcia G. Ory, Paul A. Estabrooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 36% |
| Canada | 9 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Iceland | 1 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 45 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 32 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,516 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1516 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 235 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 181 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 172 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 88 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 5% |
| Other | 255 | 17% |
| Unknown | 508 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 247 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 186 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 120 | 8% |
| Psychology | 115 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 54 | 4% |
| Other | 200 | 13% |
| Unknown | 594 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#733,175
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#389
of 14,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,738
of 365,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#8
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.