You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making Hard Choices in Local Public Health Spending With a Cost-Benefit Analysis Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee Robertson, Chris Skelly, David Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,106,708
of 24,171,551 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,274
of 12,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,542
of 354,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#20
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.