You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electronic Immunization Registries in Tanzania and Zambia: Shaping a Minimum Viable Product for Scaled Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00218 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn Seymour, Laurie Werner, Francis Dien Mwansa, Ngwegwe Bulula, Henry Mwanyika, Mandy Dube, Brian Taliesin, Dykki Settle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,040,649
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,212
of 11,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,460
of 346,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#22
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.