↓ Skip to main content

RE-AIM in the Real World: Use of the RE-AIM Framework for Program Planning and Evaluation in Clinical and Community Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RE-AIM in the Real World: Use of the RE-AIM Framework for Program Planning and Evaluation in Clinical and Community Settings
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bethany M. Kwan, Hannah L. McGinnes, Marcia G. Ory, Paul A. Estabrooks, Jeanette A. Waxmonsky, Russell E. Glasgow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 270 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 13 5%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 89 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 13%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Psychology 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 104 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,429,121
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#723
of 14,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,895
of 476,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#13
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.