You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adapting and Operationalizing the RE-AIM Framework for Implementation Science in Environmental Health: Clean Fuel Cooking Programs in Low Resource Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashlinn K. Quinn, Gila Neta, Rachel Sturke, Christopher O. Olopade, Suzanne L. Pollard, Kenneth Sherr, Joshua P. Rosenthal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,595,624
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#7,895
of 10,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382,640
of 458,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#74
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.