You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effectiveness of Crisis Line Services: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00399 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam S. Hoffberg, Kelly A. Stearns-Yoder, Lisa A. Brenner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Dominican Republic | 2 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 57 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#650,240
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#336
of 14,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,174
of 483,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#6
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.